The Twigs and Leaves
(Embellishment and Adornment)
"As its ugly fruit, like the heads of the devils"
Wahhabi/Salafi
Even today, this sect is known by these names: Salafi, Wahhabi,Najdi and Ahl al-Hadith...etc.
It is generally known that today they prefer to call themselves:
Salafi
Initially, at the time when the British were ruling in India, the followers of ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab an-Najdi were called Wahhabisbut Maulana Mu-hammad Husayn Batalvi made an application to the viceroy of India that they be called Ahl al-Hadith rather than Wahhabi - this application was granted.
The Twigs
Pharaohs of our time
Rashid Rida (1865-1935)
8 - "Of the Islamic umma, many became profound scholars. Such murshids as Hujjat al-Islam Imam al-Ghazali and Shaikh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyya were of these."
He represents such a la-madhhabi person as Ibn Taymiyya, who said that Allahu ta'ala was an object, who disbelieved the fact that non-Muslims would be tormented eternally in Hell, who claimed that it was not necessary to perform an omitted fard salat, and who tried to demolish Islam from within through many other similar corrupt ideas, as an Islamic scholar and murshid, and introduces him as a mujtahid like the great Islamic scholar al-Ghazali.
Writing these two names together is a misleading invention like putting a piece of black stone by the side of a diamond.
The Maliki scholar Ahmad ibn Sawi wrote: "The scholars of Ahl as-Sunnat reported that Ibn Taymiyya deviated from the right path himself and also caused many Muslims to deviate. It is a lie that he had had companionship with the Maliki scholar Imam Ashhab."[The tafsir book Al-Jalalain, in the interpretation of the 230th ayat of Surat
Further reading:
or visit: Here
Al-Manar (journal)
Rashid Rida printed a Magazine called "Al Minar" which was disseminated all over the Muslim world and for the first time ever"Salafi Manhaj" was born. (also see: al-Albani)
Sayyid Qutb (1906-1966)
REFORMER SAYYID QUTB EXPRESSES HIS ADMIRATION OF IBN AL-TAIMIYYA (TAYMIYYA)
48 - Sayyid Qutb, one of the religion reformers of this century, too, announced his admiration for Ibn Taymiyya and Muhammad 'Abduh in almost all his books. In The Future is Islam's, for example, he praised only the word 'Islam' but he did not explain what he understood from this word or in which madhhab he was.On its ninety-fourth page, he wrote:
"The spiritual leader struggling in the front row of those who protected Muslim countries against the Tatar invasions was Ibn Taymiyya."
Further reading:
The Devil's Horns
Bin Baaz, (1910- 1999)
Abdul Aziz ibn Abdullah ibn Abdur-Rahaman ibn Muhammad ibn Abdullah alee Baaz as Bin Baaz, was the Grand Mufti of Saudi Arabia from 1993 until his death in 1999.
"The Correct Belief and the Things that are Against this Belief."
On p. 58 of this book he states:
"Second: Whoever places intermediaries between himselfand Allahu ta'ala, begs them, asks them for intercession and trusts them, becomes kafir with ijma.
"Second: Whoever places intermediaries between himselfand Allahu ta'ala, begs them, asks them for intercession and trusts them, becomes kafir with ijma.
^
al-Albani (1914-1999)
Mu-hammad Nasiruddin al-Albani
^
“He also learnt from his father the art of clock and watch repair - and became highly skilled in that and famous for it and derived his earnings through it. He began to specialise in the field of Hadeeth and its related sciences by the age of 20 -being influenced by articles in 'al-Manaar' magazine.”
^from: fatwa-online.com
more info: ^ The Clockmakers Son
al-Uthaymeen (1925-2001)
Abu 'Abd Allah Mu-hammad ibn Saalih ibn Muhammad ibn al-Uthaymeen at-Tamimi an-Najdi.
He made the following statements in his Fatawa:
"No human being seeks a means through something except he believes that it possesses effectiveness towards the end he desires."
"No human being seeks a means through something except he believes that it possesses effectiveness towards the end he desires."
He made this statement in order to enable himself to declare those who make tawassul, apostate.
"We must not call the Messenger of Allah 
Habîbullâh ("the Beloved of Allah") but only Khalîlullâh ("the Intimate Friend of Allah").
Habîbullâh ("the Beloved of Allah") but only Khalîlullâh ("the Intimate Friend of Allah").
"We should not ask the Prophet to ask forgiveness for usbecause the deeds of a human being end the moment he dies andhe cannot even ask forgiveness for himself."
to ask forgiveness for usbecause the deeds of a human being end the moment he dies andhe cannot even ask forgiveness for himself."
Shaykh Mamduh called this statement "impudent" and "a blunder"
and refuted it in Raf` al-Minara (p. 81-86).
Like the rest of his sect, `Uthaymin is an anthropomorphist who asserts "two eyes" for the Most High and Exalted in his commentary on Ibn Taymiyya's al-Wasitiyya, whereas none of the Salaf went beyond asserting "the eye" and "the eyes" without adding"two" into the letter of the Qur'an and the hadith, and Ibn Hazm remarked,
"To say that He has two eyes is null and void and part of the belief of anthropomorphists."
---
Abu Dhar said,
“I was with the Prophet (صلى الله عليه و آله وسلم) one day and I heard him saying:
It was then that I became afraid, so I said: ” Oh Rasool Allah!Which thing is that?”
---
The Leaves
"As its ugly fruit, like the heads of the devils"
The anthropomorphists continue on this evilpath to destroy the correct belief in the Creator. They lie when they claim to be Sunnis!
Ibn Jibreen (1930-2009)
Dr. Abdullah Bin Jibreen, one of the Kingdom’s senior Ulema
Extinct for 400 years
He admits that his belief system was only taught in hiding!
He admits that his belief system was only taught in hiding!
Hiding for 4 Centuries
...In short, if you are a follower of Ibn Jibriin, Ibn Baaz, Ibn ˆUtħaymiin, and other so-called “Salafis,” know that you are a follower of a sect that has been in hiding formost of history since the Hijrah. They claim to know and follow what the Salaf believed, although they are in opposition to 95% of all scholars of all the major Islamic sciences.
Part of this belief includes:
1. Denying the use of rational proof to prove that the Creator exists,
2. Questioning the mind as a tool for knowing right from wrong,
3. Believing that despite the mind being unreliable, a belief that has been narrated in hiding over several centuries is known with absolute certainty to be correctly narrated.
If you think that is just fine, and doesn’t sound like a setup for making you accept blindly, then I can’t help you."
Part of this belief includes:
1. Denying the use of rational proof to prove that the Creator exists,
2. Questioning the mind as a tool for knowing right from wrong,
3. Believing that despite the mind being unreliable, a belief that has been narrated in hiding over several centuries is known with absolute certainty to be correctly narrated.
If you think that is just fine, and doesn’t sound like a setup for making you accept blindly, then I can’t help you."
Other Wahhabi/Salafi
Anthropomorphists
Sheikh Feiz
read:Here
Dr Zakir Naik
^
Also: Here
----
And the example of a bad saying is like a filthy tree, which is cut off above the ground, therefore not having stability.
[Ibrahim 14:26]
others that support this
"Wahhabi Tree"
Deobandi
Fathers of Deobandi Evil
Ismail Dehlvi (d. 1246 AH)(d.1830CE)
(author of Taqwiat-ul-Iman & Sirat-e-Mustaqeem...etc)
Qasim al-Nanautwi (d. 1297 AH)(1879CE)
(author of TahzeerunNass & Tasfiat-ul-Aqaid...etc)
Rasheed Ahmad Gangohi (d. 1323 AH)(1905 CE)
(author of Fataawa Rasheediyah...etc )
Khaleel Ahmad Ambethvi (d.1346 AH)(1927 CE)
(author of Baraaheen-e-Qaati'ah...etc)
Ashraf Ali Thanvi (d. 1362 AH)(1943 CE)
(author of Hifz-ul-Iman...etc)
KUFR STATEMENTS BYDEOBANDIS
Note:^ Their Original (old books) in Urdu and Persiannot the edited Urdu and English Versions/Translations that the Deobandi keep boasting about!
more info:
Fatwa of Kuffr Upon
The Forefathers of Wahabi/Deobandi & Tableeghi Sect
---
THE RISE OF WAHHABI FITNAH-INDIAN SUBCONTINENT
(1239 AH - 1823 CE)
also read:
(Discussing Maulana Qasim Nanotwi's Tahdhir al-Nas, etc.)
---
DEOBANDIS AND WAHABIS
AL MUHANNAD says ibn abdul wahab was a bad man who killed sunnis and this mufti of deobandis say that ibn abdul wahab was a good man !"
This is called policy of appeasement !
---
THIS IS YET ANOTHER PROOF THAT AL MUHANNAD WAS WRITTEN TO FOOL THE SUNNI ARAB SCHOLARS!
---
...And another offshoot of the Wahhabi-Deobandis:
The Tableeghi Jamaat in one breath contradicts itself.
They claim it is a Sunnah of the Prophets and Sahaba and in the same breath, that the
founder of this movement is
If in reality this is a Sunnah of the Prophet (Sallalaahu AlayhiWasallam) as claimed, then it must be proven by authentic Islamic books that the Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam) and the Sahaba also used to form Jamaats and do Ghast and Tableeg of Kalima and Namaaz amongst Muslims?
If this is proved to be Sunnah of the Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi
Wasallam) and Sahaba, then why was this Sunnah ignored for 1400 years and do we
classify all the past Spiritual Illuminaries as anti-Sunnah?
If this claim be true that this is the Sunnah practice, then surely
Molwi Llyas is definetly not the founder.
If it is the Sunnah of the Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam) then they are the rightful founders of Tableeg and not Molwi Ilyas as claimed. If Molwi Ilyas is the founder, then obviously this type of Tableeg did not exist before him, and if so, it can be called a Sunnah.
(It is Bidah!)
A SHOCKING CONFESSION
Molwi Ihtashmul Hasan,
the most
respected confidant, Khalifa and Brother-in-Law of
Molwi Ilyas
(founder of Tableeghi Sect)
From childhood to old age the major portion of his life was spent in leadingand guiding Tableeghi Jamaat. Establishing a relationship with the Saudi Wahabi government was his personal achievement. In spite of this he has stripped the Tableeghi Jamaat absolutely naked at the junction for all to openly see.
The name of his kitaab is "Zindagi Ki Sirat-e-MustÃkeem."
Under the heading ‘Zaroori Intibah’ (important announcement) he writes:
"The present form of Tableeg taking place from Markaz Nizamudeen (Headquarters of Tableeghi Jamaat), in my opinion and knowledge is neither in accordance with the Quran or Hadith. It is not in agreement with the teachings of Hazrat Mujaddid Alf-e- Saani and Hazrat Shah Wali-ullah Muhaddis Dehlawi and the rightly-guided Ulema.
Those Ulema who are actively engaged in Tableeg, it is their first and foremost duty to conform it to the teachings of Quran, Hadith and the past leaders and Ulema. It is beyond my comprehension that a service, which in the lifetime of Moulana Ilyas was confined to Bidat-ê-Hasana (good innovation) in spite of the strict implementation of Osool’s (principles), can now be regarded as the most important service to Islam,
even if done absolutely haphazardly. Now in its degenerated state it cannot even be called a good innovation (Bidat-ê-Hasana). I want to expose this and end my responsibilities."
Some comments were made in a book called:
"ChashmaÃ-Aaftaab"
(Author – Molwi Qaamrudin Mazahiri):
"Moulana Ihtashaamul Hasan Kandhalwi is a foundation member of this movement. Recently, he made a severe attack on Tableeghi Jamaat and has labeled it as a group that mislead people. It is surprising that being the initial member and advisor up to now, his views being implemented for so long, principles were formulated by him totally, what evil does he now see, that has generated his opposition?"
(ChashmaÃ-Aaftaab, pp/3, printed in Kanpur).
Molwi Mehmood Hasan Gangohi has also commented:
"I was under the impression that Molwi Ihtashaamul Hasan has left the Tableeghi Markaz in Delhi due to ill health and permanently settled in Kandhala and owing to this, is unable to participate in Tableeghi activities. But it was not so. The actual reason of his abstention from the Tableeghi Jamaat was that in his opinion the present Tableeg is not a religious act and, on the contrary, corrupts the religion."
(ChashmaÃ-Aaftaab, pp/7)
Elsewhere he writes:
"You regard this Tableeg contrary to Quran and Hadith and acause of destruction of the Ummah."
He further comments: "You have not clarified as exactly after how many years of
Molwi Ilyas’s death this Tableeg degenerated from good to bad innovation and
became a destructive factor for the Ummah. Was it so immediately?"
(Chashmae Aaftaab, pp/e5)
The question is not
"How long it took to degenerate from Bidat Hasana to Bidat
Sayyia?"
(from good to evil Bidah).
The real question is "What was the status of
Tableeghi Jamaat in the life time of Moulana Ilyas? Was it a Bidah or Sunnah?"
A passage of time does not change the status of an organisation, so why were simple
Muslims misled into believing Tableegh to be a Sunnat, whilst in reality it is a Bidah?
He goes on: "I am surprised to see that you sat and watched an organisation to which you had been attached for so many years deteriorate right before you and you
could not even issue a single statement against it."
Aaftaab, pp/7)
Moulana Ihtashaamul Hasan has pointed out two important facts i.e.:
1. Tableeghi Jamaat, in its present form is an evil Bidat, because of its Islamic Defects and inherent fitna.
2. The present Tableeghi Jamaat is definitely not in accordance with Quran and Hadith or in agreement with the schools of thought of Shah Waliallah, Hazrat
Mujaddid Alf Thani or other past luminaries of Islam.
(The latter is the reviver of
Islam who served in India in the 10th Century)
more info: here
---
Other Leaves of the Wahabi Tree
Jama'at-e-Islami, Ahle Hadith, Jamiat Ahle Hadith,Jama'atut Da'wa, Jamiat-e-Ulama-e-Hind, Millat-e-Islamia, Tanzeem-e-Islami, Jama'atul Muslimeen,... etc
The Holy Prophet (sallal laahu alaihi wasallam) said:
"Seventy-two (of the 73 sects of the Muslim nation) will be in the fire, and only one will be in Paradise ; it is the Jama'ah (i.e. Ahle Sunnah Wa Jamaah)."
(Abi Dawud, Ad-Darimi, Ahmad)
The Holy Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam) has prophesied that many individuals and religious sects will cause dissension and mischief till the Day of Judgment. He has made a particular reference to the Wahabi Movement
Hazrat Abu Huzaifa (Radiallahu Anhu) narrates a Hadith concerning the leaders of the mischief makers: "I swear by Allah that the Holy Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam) has not left out a single leader of Fitna from this day to the Day of
Qiyamah. Their followers would number 300 or more and further gave their names and that of their tribe."
(Abu Dawood)
---
Imam Abu Ya’la (Rehmatullah Alay) narrates a Hadith fromHazrat Anas bin Malik (Radiallahu Anhu) and the Author of ‘Ibriz’ who states:
"Hazrat Anas Bin Malik (Radiallahu Anhu) narrates that inMedina, there lived a very ‘pious’ youngster. One day we made reference about this youngster to the Holy Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam). In spite of the Sahaba describing the youngster’s features and character to the Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam), the Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam) was unable to recognise the youngster made mention of. However, a few days later, whilst we were in the company of the Holy Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam), the young man passed that way. On seeing the young man, the Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam) exclaimed: ‘I see the scabs of Shaitaan imprinted on his face.’ The youngster then approached the Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam) and made salutation.
The Holy Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam) then said to him:
‘Is it not true that right now you are thinking that there is no one better than yourself here.’ The youngster then replied: ‘Yes, these thoughts did pass my mind.’ He then walked away into the Musjid.
The Prophet then enquired as to who will kill this person.
Hazrat Abu Bakr (Radiallahu Anhu) volunteered to do so and entered the Masjid and saw the person he was to kill engrossed in performing his Salaat and he remembered a Hadith of the Holy Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam) which prohibited one from killing a person who is performing his Salaat and returned to the Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam).
The Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam) again enquired as to who will kill the youngster, this time
Hazrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) volunteered to kill him and entered the Musjid and found the youngster performing his Sajda and with the same thoughts as Hazrat Abu Bakr (Radiallahu Anhu), Hazrat Umar (Radiallahu Anhu) returned to the Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam). For the third time the Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam) again enquired who will kill the youngster, this time?
Hazrat Ali (Radiallahu Anhu) volunteered to do so, the Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam) said: ‘You will surely kill him, if you find him.’
When Hazrat Ali entered the Musjid, he was surprised to see that the youngster was no longer in the Musjid and he too like the others returned to the Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam).
The Holy Prophet (Sallalaahu Alayhi Wasallam) said:
‘If you had only killed him then all the Fitna in my Ummah till Day of Qiyamah would have been wiped out and no two persons in my Ummah would have fought between themselves.’"
[Ibreez Shareef. pp/277, Author Allama Shah Abdul Aziz Dab bag (ra)]
The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) and his Companions finally threw them out of the mosque and theMunafiqeen were compelled to build their own mosque nearby called:
Masjid-e- Dirar
Masjid Dirar was built near Masjid Qubâ' in Madinah, by the hypocrites led by Abu Amir Rahib. They invited the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم to pray there, with intention to trick and mislead him. But Allâh did not permit the Prophet صلى الله عليه وسلم to go and pray there. As it says in Surat At-Taubah:
And those (hypocrites) who built a mosque to cause harm, and due to disbelief, and in order to cause divisions among the Muslims, and to await the one who is at the outset an opponent of Allah and His Noble Messenger; and they will surely swear that "We wished only good"; and Allah is witness that they are indeed liars.[Taubah 9:107]
Subsequently Allah ordered the Prophet (Sallallahu Alayhi Wasallam) to burn and raze their mosque to the ground.
After 1 400 years the Munafiqeen of this 15th Century built their mosque in the same vicinity where Masjid-e-Dirar once stood.
This mosque is now called Masjid-e-Noor. What an appropriate coincidence.
---
Dajaal
KFR
Reported in the reference of Nawawi
"Gardens of Righteousness"
Abdullah, the son of Amr
The Protection of Mecca andMedina
The Protection of Mecca and
"The anti-Christ will enter each and every city exceptMecca and Medina
The domes in those two cities will be guarded by angels standing in rows.
The anti-Christ will arrive at Sabakhah andMedina
Reported by Umm Sharik in the reference of Nawawi, "Gardens of Righteousness"
---
The Mischief of the anti-Christ
From the creation of Adam to the Day of Judgement there is no affair that is greater than the mischief of the anti-Christ."
"The Day of Judgement will not commence until the Muslims have fought the Unbelievers
and the Unbelievers seek refuge behind a rock or a tree, and the rock or tree calls out:
'O Muslim, there is a Unbeliever hiding behind me, come and kill him.'
But the thorny Gharkad tree will not call out because it is the tree of the Unbelieverss.'"
Reported in the reference of Nawawi, "Gardens of Righteousness" and Bukhari and Muslim by Abu Hurayrah.
---
---
The End of The Wahhabi Tree
---
Sahih Bukhari: Volume 3, Book 30, Number 105:
Narrated Anas bin Malik: The Prophet said, "There will be no town which Ad-Dajjal will not enter except Mecca and Medina, and there will be no entrance (road) (of both Mecca and Medina) but the angels will be standing in rows guarding it against him, and then Medina will shake with its inhabitants thrice (i.e. three earth-quakes will take place) and Allah will expel all the nonbelieversand the hypocrites from it."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.